Jobscan
Compares your resume with a job description and highlights areas to review.
Check first: Treat a match score as guidance, not an employer's decision or a hiring guarantee.
Visit Jobscan (opens in a new tab)ATS guide
What parsing does, which formatting choices to review and why a resume score is not a hiring decision.
The key point
Follow the employer’s file instructions, use a clear text-based layout and check any fields filled from the upload. ATS-friendly means easier to process and understand—not guaranteed selection.
An applicant tracking system, or ATS, helps an employer manage candidates and applications. Parsing is a narrower task: extracting information from a resume into fields. Lever describes readable information being populated into a candidate profile. (Lever — Understanding resume parsing, opens in a new tab)
That distinction matters. An upload can be readable without proving that you meet the role's requirements. A problem extracting a field also does not, by itself, establish that an application was automatically rejected. Greenhouse documents cases in which a resume remains attached and details need manual input after a failed parse. (Greenhouse — Unsuccessful resume parse, opens in a new tab)
For a general online application, our suggested default is a single column, familiar headings and text in a normal reading order. Keep the name and contact details in the main body rather than relying on decorative boxes.
Greenhouse identifies columns, graphics, image-only uploads and some header, footer or text-box layouts as potential parsing problems. These are limitations of a specific parser, not proof that every other system behaves identically. (Greenhouse — Unsuccessful resume parse, opens in a new tab)
Removing decorative elements does not mean removing information. Keep the job title, organization, dates and supporting bullets grouped so a person can also follow them. Use formatting to clarify a sequence, not to turn the resume into a poster.
Read the actual posting and identify relevant skills you have. If you use a named tool, spell it consistently. If your original bullet says “worked with software,” replace that vagueness with the software and task you actually performed.
Do not paste an entire job description into the resume, add hidden text, list a credential you do not hold or claim every tool named in the posting. The application still needs to be truthful when a person reads it or asks follow-up questions.
Harvard's advice on AI and resumes discusses basic formatting and relevant keywords in context. It does not turn keyword overlap into proof of suitability for a role. (Harvard MCS — AI for resumes and cover letters, opens in a new tab)
Use the format and size permitted by the application. Do not assume that PDF is always required or that DOCX is always superior. The employer's stated requirements are the first constraint.
Open the exported file and try selecting the text. Paste a short section into a plain-text editor to inspect whether words remain in a sensible order. This is a useful basic check, but it does not reproduce every ATS parser and cannot certify compatibility.
Check for broken letters, missing text and reordered sections. If the file is a scan or image, return to an editable original and export a text-based version. Avoid uploading an oversized file just to preserve large decorative images.
When the portal fills application fields from the resume, check them before submitting. Pay special attention to your name, email, phone, role titles, organizations and employment dates. An extraction error can be corrected in the form without inventing a new account of your experience.
If you cannot edit a field, use the portal's help instructions rather than repeatedly creating duplicate applications. Save the confirmation and the file version you used.
| Check | Useful for | Does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Open the export | Seeing clipped pages or missing content | That an employer will accept you |
| Select and paste text | Spotting image-only text or reading-order issues | Compatibility with every parser |
| Review populated fields | Correcting this application's extracted details | A ranking against other applicants |
| Use a resume checker | Prompts to examine wording or relevance | The employer's actual screening score |
Fields are missing: simplify the structure, check the file type and manually correct the fields if the portal permits it. Text is scrambled: inspect the export and reading order. A checker wants more keywords: decide whether each suggestion is true and relevant rather than adding everything.
You received a rejection: do not infer the cause from the rejection alone. Qualifications, timing, availability and employer decisions are separate from parsing. Without direct evidence, the reason remains unknown.
Start with the targeted resume guide if the document is structurally readable but does not explain why you fit the work.
Optional tools
A matching tool may help you notice wording to review against a posting. Do not change truthful information just to increase its score.
These links currently go to official provider websites without configured referral tracking. This is a shortlist by task, not a hands-on ranking. How our links work.
Compares your resume with a job description and highlights areas to review.
Check first: Treat a match score as guidance, not an employer's decision or a hiring guarantee.
Visit Jobscan (opens in a new tab)Not necessarily. Greenhouse documents a workflow where a resume can remain attached even if extraction fails. That example does not tell us how every employer handles an application.
There is no universal score established here. A checker score belongs to the checker and should be treated as feedback. It is not evidence of the employer’s settings or final decision.
You can choose a design, but inspect the file and the employer’s requirements. Keep an uncomplicated text-based version for workflows where parsing or export problems are a concern.
This is AI-assisted, source-based guidance, not a report of a personal hiring outcome or a hands-on product test. Examples and worksheets are original illustrations. Official instructions for a particular employer take priority. See our editorial guidelines.
Sources accessed for this release on September 13, 2026. Linked sites can change independently of this guide.
Something needs correcting? Send the page URL and the detail we should check.